Miyoo / Bittboy
A30
65
HR Rating
74
User Rating
A30 / XU Mini M
Verdict
XU Mini M has the strongest overall profile in this A30 vs XU Mini M comparison. XU Mini M leads the summary view with HR rating 73 and user rating 89. A30 is the lower-priced option at $30, while XU Mini M comes in at $70. For emulation, travel, and daily handheld use, weigh the score gap against price, library fit, ergonomics, and owner feedback.
Ranking Breakdown
Field
A30Miyoo / Bittboy
XU Mini MMagicX
The VersusComparable numbers · ▲ marks the winner
Price
$30
$70
HR Rating
65
73
User Rating
74
89
Release Year
2024
2024
Screen Size (Inches)
2.8
2.8
The SpreadCategory scores · ▲ marks the leader
Battery Life
73
73
Brightness
60
60
Controls
67
67
Durability
69
69
Ease Of Use
61
61
Ergonomics
67
67
Haptics
44
44
Hardware
59
59
OS Support
56
57
Performance
46
46
Portability
67
67
Screen Quality
52
52
Software
61
61
Speakers
51
51
Value
61
61
The FactsNo winners here — just what each device is
Architecture
ARM
ARM
Aspect Ratio
4:3
4:3
Battery
2600 mAh (Source)
2600 mAh
Connectivity
Wi-Fi 4
None
CPU
Cortex-A7
Cortex-A35
Form Factor
Horizontal
Horizontal
GPU
Mali-400 MP2
Mali-G31 MP2
Make
Miyoo
MagicX
Model
A30
XU Mini M
OS
Linux
Linux
RAM Size
<1 GB
<1 GB
Best Resolution for Retro Gaming
640 x 480
640 x 480
Screen Type
IPS
IPS
Storage
External MicroSD
Dual External MicroSD
System on a Chip (SoC)
Allwinner A33
Rockchip RK3562 (Rockchip RK3326)
Touch Screen
False
False
Video Output
None
None
RAM Type
—
DDR3
Where to buy
Device
Price
Storefronts
Availability
A30
$30
Not carried
XU Mini M
$70
None listed
Not carried
What owners say
Overall user rating
A3074/100 · 10
XU Mini M89/100 · 11
Comments
No comments on this device yet — be the first to weigh in.
Related matchups
A30XU Mini M
Total Threads
0
Fresh discussion activity
Solved Questions
0
Accepted answers are not supported yet
Trending Topics
No trending topics yet.
0 comments
Scoped replies, owner tips, and performance notes.
Sort
Loading discussion...
