ANBERNIC
RG-351P
43
HR Rating
53
User Rating
Compare
RG-351P / Zero 40
Verdict
Zero 40 has the strongest overall profile in this RG-351P vs Zero 40 comparison. Zero 40 leads the summary view with HR rating 62 and user rating 65. Its clearest measurable advantages are release year (2025 vs 2020), screen size (4.0 vs 3.5). RG-351P is the lower-priced option at USD 45, while Zero 40 comes in at USD 75. For emulation, travel, and long sessions, weigh those score gaps against battery, screen, storage, and price rather than picking on raw ranking alone.
Specs
Ranking Breakdown
Field
RG-351PANBERNIC
Zero 40MagicX
The VersusComparable numbers · ▲ marks the winner
Price
USD 45
USD 75
HR Rating
43
62
User Rating
53
65
Release Year
2020
2025
Screen Size (Inches)
3.5
4.0
The SpreadCategory scores · ▲ marks the leader
Battery Life
72
67
Brightness
61
61
Controls
67
55
Durability
70
60
Ease Of Use
62
63
Ergonomics
67
57
Haptics
45
58
Hardware
61
61
OS Support
58
58
Performance
48
68
Portability
67
70
Screen Quality
53
69
Software
62
60
Speakers
52
66
Value
61
57
The FactsNo winners here — just what each device is
Architecture
ARM
ARM
Aspect Ratio
3:2
3:5
Battery
3500 mAh
4300 mAh
Connectivity
Dual USB-C OTG, WiFi (internal only on 1st batch, all following batches require external WiFi dongle)
WiFi 4, Bluetooth 4.2
CPU
Cortex-A35
Cortex-A53, 4 Cores, 4 Threads, 1.8 GHz
Form Factor
Horizontal
Horizontal
GPU
Mali-G31 MP2
PowerVR GE8300, 1 Core, 660 MHz
Make
ANBERNIC
MagicX
Model
RG-351P
Zero 40
OS
EmuELEC, 351ELEC, ArkOS, Batocera, Lakka, 351Droid (Lineage 18.1 / Android 11)
Android 10 / Linux
RAM Size
<1 GB
2
RAM Type
DDR3
DDR4
Best Resolution for Retro Gaming
320 x 480
480 x 800
Screen Type
IPS
IPS, 60 Hz
Storage
External MicroSD
Dual External MicroSD
System on a Chip (SoC)
RockChip RK3326
Allwinner A133 Plus
Touch Screen
false
true
Video Output
0
None
average price
—
—
dimensions
—
136 x 105 x 17 mm
weight
—
182 g
Pricing Snapshot
Where to buy
Device
Price
Storefronts
Availability
RG-351P
USD 45
Not carried
Zero 40
USD 75
Not carried
Community Pulse
What owners say
Overall user rating
RG-351P53/100 · 10
Zero 4065/100 · 10
Comments
No comments on this device yet — be the first to weigh in.
People Also Compare
Related matchups
Discussion
RG-351PZero 40
Talk through tradeoffs, questions, benchmarks, and owner context for this comparison.
Total Threads
0
Fresh discussion activity
Solved Questions
0
Accepted answers are not supported yet
Trending Topics
No trending topics yet.
0 comments
Scoped replies, owner tips, and performance notes.
Sort
Loading discussion...
Videos
